Legal Opinion

Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. Hodurski

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 16, 2004No. 1022154PublishedCited by 234 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama ("BCBS") appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court in favor of Donald Hodurski, M.D., and two physician assistants, Norman Hobbs and Samuel Irvine (hereinafter collectively referred to as "the providers"). The issue presented is whether a statute included in the Insurance Code, the Physician Assistant Act, codified at § 27-51-1, Ala. Code 1975, is applicable to BCBS, a nonprofit health-care service organization that exists pursuant to Title 10 of the Alabama Code of 1975. BCBS argues that the Physician Assistant Act cannot…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by234 opinions

  1. Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Prince v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Aliant Bank v. Four Star Invs., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Griffin v. Unocal Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Congleton v. Jackson County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API