Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Austin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2009No. 1061505PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Nationwide”) appeals from an order of the Madison Circuit Court denying Nationwide’s motion to show satisfaction of the judgment and granting Walter George Austin and Charlene Austin’s motion for taxation of additional costs following a judgment in favor of the Austins. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. Facts and Procedural History

On May 18, 2004, the Austins’ vehicle was involved in an accident with a vehicle driven by Stephen Anthony Horton. The Austins suffered injuries as a result of this accident, and they filed a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. The Export Group Emilio Figueroa Jack Andrews v. Reef Industries, Inc., and Mexican Coffee InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Sloss Industries Corporation v. EurisolCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  4. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Looney v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Har-Mar Collisions, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  3. Gallant v. GallantCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
  4. Antoine v. Oxmoor Preservation/One, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  5. Hobbs v. HeiseyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API