Legal Opinion

Ex parte Hutchinson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington

Decided May 16, 1904No. 1,183PublishedCited by 17 opinions

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus..

1Opinion of the Court

HANFORD, District Judge.

Ordinance No. 6036 of the city of Seattle requires a person carrying on business as a pawnbroker to pay $100 per annum for a license, and exacts payment of six times as much for a license to sell trading stamps to merchants, in addition to a license fee of $100 per annum, which each merchant using trading stamps in his business is required to pay. It is very apparent that the purpose of this ordinance with respect to trading stamps is to prohibit their use in retail trade aá a means of drawing custom, rather than to provide revenue, or to exercise in a reasonable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fleetwood v. ReadWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stull v. De MattosWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Seattle v. BartoWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Sperry and Hutchinson Co. v. MargettsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  3. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. HoeghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Whitcomb v. EmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Oklahoma Retail Grocers Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API