City of Seattle v. Barto
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.- — -Hon. Arthur E. Griffih, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
'Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by
Fullerton, C. J.
— The appellant was convicted of the •offense of engaging in the business of a pawnbroker in the ■city of Seattle without first having procured a license therefor, as required by an ordinance of the city, and from the judgment of conviction appeals. The question presented by the record is the validity of the ordinance under which the conviction was had. The several objections made we shall notice in order.
It is said first that the ordinance contains more than one ■object. The charter of the city of Seattle (Freeholders’ 1896, art. 4,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Marston v. HumesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Lancey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State v. Seattle Taxicab & Transfer, Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Kimmel v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. SharplessWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Carstens v. DeSellemWashington Supreme Court · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.