Whitcomb v. Emerson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, J.,
pro tern. — This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff enjoining the defendants, their deputies, agents and successors in office, from enforcing or executing the provisions of an act of the legislature of the State of California, approved May 31, 1927, known as the “Act Concerning Cosmetology,” (Stats. 1927, page 1711) or of any amendment to said act insofar as the same prevents or impairs the practice of the plaintiff from engaging in the operation of massaging, stimulating or beautifying the face, neck and upper part of the human body by means of the hands and use…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Hogan v. IngoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Central States Theatre Corporation v. SarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
- United Interchange, Inc. v. SpellacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Doyle v. Board of Barber ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.