Legal Opinion

Sperry and Hutchinson Co. v. Margetts

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 5, 1954PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

We inquire here as to whether the use of plaintiff’s long-established trading stamp discount system by retailers of motor fuel would constitute a violation of L. 1938, c. 163, as amended by L. 1939, c. 62, and L. 1952, c. 258, N. J. S. A. 56:6-2, directing: (a) the posting as therein provided of the price per gallon of motor fuel sold by such retailers from a pump or other dispensing equipment, including all taxes, state and federal, levied on the “manufacture or sale” of the fuel, which “shall remain posted and in effect for a period of not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Ex parte HutchinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1904

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Houman v. Mayor & Coun. Bor. Pompton LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. Glaser v. DownesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. HoeghSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Supermarkets Gen. Corp. v. SillsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Oklahoma Retail Grocers Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API