Legal Opinion

Himschoot v. Shanley

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1996No. S-5813, S-5843PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In January 1989, while employed by the Alaska Marine Highway System (AMHS), Thomas Shanley was in a car accident. The vehicle in which Shanley rode was owned and driven by Rick Garrison. The vehicle that struck Garrison’s vehicle was owned by the State of Alaska, and driven by the State’s agent, Rebecca Himschoot of the Legislative Affairs Agency.

Shanley sued the State to recover damages for the injuries he sustained in the accident. The State raised the affirmative defense that the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) was the exclusive…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. City of Nome v. Catholic Bishop of Northern AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ehredt v. DeHavilland Aircraft Co. of CanadaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Anchorage Roofing Co., Inc. v. GonzalesAlaska Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Pagenkopf v. Chatham Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Zaverl v. HanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Lloyd's & Institute of London Underwriting Companies v. FultonAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Estate of Milos v. Quality Asphalt Paving, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API