Legal Opinion

Lloyd's & Institute of London Underwriting Companies v. Fulton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2000No. Nos. S-8136, S-8185PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

An accident aboard a fishing vessel in the Bering Sea provoked a decade-long dispute between the vessel's owner and its insurers. The case raises two significant questions concerning an insurer's duties toward its insured: Upon discovering potential reasons to deny coverage, must an insurer promptly inform its insured of the problems? And does the insurer estop itself from denying *1201coverage if it breaches this duty by withholding notice to its insured while it investigates its coverage defenses? The superior court answered "yes" to both questions. Because…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coventry Associates v. Am. States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Coventry Associates v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pagenkopf v. Chatham Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Pederson v. BarnesAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc. v. Ingaldson Fitzgerald, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Government Employees Insurance Co. v. GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Lutz v. First Financial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API