Lloyd's & Institute of London Underwriting Companies v. Fulton
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
An accident aboard a fishing vessel in the Bering Sea provoked a decade-long dispute between the vessel's owner and its insurers. The case raises two significant questions concerning an insurer's duties toward its insured: Upon discovering potential reasons to deny coverage, must an insurer promptly inform its insured of the problems? And does the insurer estop itself from denying *1201coverage if it breaches this duty by withholding notice to its insured while it investigates its coverage defenses? The superior court answered "yes" to both questions. Because…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Coventry Associates v. Am. States Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Coventry Associates v. American States InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Power Constructors, Inc. v. Taylor & HintzeAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
- Hayes v. Xerox Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pagenkopf v. Chatham Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Pederson v. BarnesAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc. v. Ingaldson Fitzgerald, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. GonzalezAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Lutz v. First Financial InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.