Legal Opinion

Zaverl v. Hanley

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2003No. S-9312PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Margaret Zaverl’s estate sued her surgeon and her pulmonologist, alleging that they negligently diagnosed and failed to treat her aortobronchial condition in 1994, causing her death. The jury returned a verdict for both physicians. At trial the surgeon testified over the estate’s objection about matters his lawyer had instructed him not to address at his pre-trial deposition. Because it was error to permit this testimony at trial, we remand for a determination whether this error prejudiced the estate’s claims against either physician. We vacate the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Langdon v. ChampionAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Thierfelder v. WolfertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fletcher v. South Peninsula HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Brannon v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Anchorage Chrysler Center, Inc. v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API