Wichinsky v. Mosa
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant Marc Wichinsky (“Wichinsky”) and respondent Ralph Mosa (“Mosa”) entered into a gaining slot route partnership called Caco. The business placed, serviced, and maintained slot and poker machines in businesses throughout Southern Nevada. After several successful years, Mosa desired to retire and both partners agreed to sell the business. Because of their inability to amicably dissolve the partnership, the parties agreed to submit the dissolution to arbitration.
Prior to arbitration, Southwest Gaming Services, Inc. (“Southwest”) expressed an interest in purchasing Caco. Southwest…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Leavitt v. Leisure Sports IncorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1987
- Lindauer v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- Bates v. ChronisterNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Driscoll v. ErreguibleNevada Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by49 opinions
- Nationwide Transport Finance v. Cass Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Fifty-Six Hope Road Music, Ltd. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.