The Tlingit and Haida Indians of Alaska and Harry Douglas, Intervenors v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1DissentNichols, Judge
I regret that I feel compelled to dissent in this case, though perhaps not as keenly as if my views commanded majority support, leading to a new trial and further delay in righting the ancient wrongs done the ancestors of these Indians. My minority position, happily, exempts me from feeling any moral scruples against saying what I think. Then too, I am not certain the errors I am concerned about do not to a degree offset each other, so that in the overall, the amount the court awards may be not so far removed from what I would have awarded if I had had sole charge of the litigation from its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.