Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Tlingit and Haida Indians of Alaska and Harry Douglas, Intervenors v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 19, 1968No. 47900Published

1DissentNichols, Judge

I regret that I feel compelled to dissent in this case, though perhaps not as keenly as if my views commanded majority support, leading to a new trial and further delay in righting the ancient wrongs done the ancestors of these Indians. My minority position, happily, exempts me from feeling any moral scruples against saying what I think. Then too, I am not certain the errors I am concerned about do not to a degree offset each other, so that in the overall, the amount the court awards may be not so far removed from what I would have awarded if I had had sole charge of the litigation from its…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. RandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  5. Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API