United States v. Meyer
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in their favor for $66,750, entered in a proceeding to condemn certain of their lands for use in connection with the dam on the Mississippi River known as Lock and Dam No. 26. Adequate disposition of the several numerous errors assigned necessitates a somewhat extended comment upon the pertinent facts. Consequently, we shall avoid repetition necessarily entailed by a separate statement of facts.
Upon both the hearing upon their motion to dismiss and the trial, defendants questioned the authority of the Government to condemn the fee…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by117 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Betty Jordan v. Kelly BinnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Becktold Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- United States v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.