Legal Opinion

United States v. Theodore A. Tirrell, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 15, 1997No. 96-2752, 96-3031PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted Theodore Tirrell of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). In sentencing Mr. Tirrell, the court decided not to apply 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), which contains a 15-year mandatory minimum sentence for defendants who violate § 922(g) and have three prior convictions for a violent felony, on the ground that Mr. Tirrell’s prior Michigan conviction for attempted unarmed robbery did not qualify as a violent felony under § 924(e). We affirm Mr. Tirrell’s conviction but reverse the district court’s § 924(e) sentencing determination.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. United States v. Joseph IencoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. David GeozosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Michael W. TrammellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Michael CarrascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API