Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Ienco
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 27, 1999No. 98-2487PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This court is reviewing Joseph Ienco’s case for a third time. Following a jury trial, the defendant was convicted of a number of federal crimes arising out of an unsuccessful extortion attempt. The crimes included conspiracy to commit extortion in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951, interstate travel in aid of racketeering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952, and using or carrying firearms during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). In United States v. Ienco, 92 F.3d 564 (7th Cir.1996) (“Ienco I”), we remanded, because of an erroneous…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Sornberger v. City Of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Osama AwadallahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BullockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. Ronald Berry WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.