Legal Opinion
United States v. David Geozos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2017No. 17-35018PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant David P. Geozos appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. When Defendant was sentenced in 2007, the district court determined that he was an armed career criminal under the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. 924(e), and sentenced him to 15 years in prison—the mandatory minimum sentence under ACCA. The court found that Defendant had five convictions that qualified as “violent felonies” under ACCA, but the court did not specify whether it found each of those…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- United States v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Antonio BlackstoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Dimott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.