Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Carrasco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2001No. 00-10224PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Michael Carrasco appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm or ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Carrasco contends that: (1) the trial court erred in admitting evidence that Carrasco was engaged in drug trafficking, (2) insufficient evidence supports the finding that Carrasco constructively possessed the firearm or ammunition, (3) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the theory of joint possession, (4) the superseding indictment violated the Speedy Trial Act, and (5) section 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Edward TerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Deborah Jean RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Narcisa SavinovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Gary E. ChesneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Michael Lawrence PollockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Stuart RommCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Andrew A. ChavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Frederick J. Morgan, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.