Legal Opinion
DiDomizio v. Frankel
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 1, 1997No. 14889PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court directing a verdict in favor of the defendant in an action brought pursuant to General Statutes § lSa-144.1
*599The principal issues presented in this appeal are whether the trial court improperly (1) directed a verdict for the defendant because the plaintiffs failed to produce sufficient evidence to support a prima facie case of liability under § 13a-144, and (2) excluded evidence of a prior accident offered to show the existence of a defect to prove notice. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Krondes v. Norwalk Savings SocietyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Sheridan v. DesmondConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Oberlander v. SullivanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Haynes v. City of MiddletownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.