Legal Opinion
Mallinson v. Black
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 14, 1996No. 14128PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
In this action sounding in negligence, the plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered after the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) directed a verdict for the defendant after the jury had returned two contradictory and inconsistent verdicts, (2) directed a verdict for the defendant after the second verdict returned by the jury was, in and of itself, inconsistent, (3) posed an interrogatory to the jury prior to its reconsideration of its first verdict, (4) directed a verdict for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Lengel v. New Haven Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Giles v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Sullivan v. City of NorwalkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Ciarlelli v. RomeoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Tisdale v. Riverside Cemetery Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Accurate Title Searches, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.