Legal Opinion

Phinney v. Casale

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 5, 1996No. 13579PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment rendered after the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and denied the plaintiffs motion to set aside that directed verdict. The plaintiff alleges that the trial court improperly (1) removed the question of negligence from the jury and directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and (2) conducted a settlement conference prior to granting the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. We agree that the trial court improperly directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and reverse the judgment of the trial court.1

The plaintiff, Helen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Doe v. ManheimerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. Lombardi v. J. A. Bergren Dairy Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Benvenuto v. MahajanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Morales v. Pentec, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Greene v. PerryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Beeman v. StratfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  5. King v. Damiron Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API