Legal Opinion
Falby v. Zarembski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 21, 1992No. 14295PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The principal issues in this appeal and cross appeal are whether sufficient evidence was presented to establish that the defendant Home Improvement and Remodeling Company, Inc., was strictly liable under General Statutes § 22-3571 as a “keeper” of the dog that attacked the named plaintiff and whether the trial court improperly denied the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint prior to trial. The named plaintiff, Roy Falby, and his wife and coplaintiff, Barbara Falby, commenced this action against the defendants, Richard Zarembski, Home Improvement and Remodeling Company, Inc. (Home…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Woolf v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. VoogSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Fleming v. GarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Lynch v. Granby Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Kevin Wagner v. Clark Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.