Legal Opinion

Lingelbach v. Carriveau

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :

Neuson, J.

Although the defendants assert and argue several assignments of error relating to the merits, and although the plaintiff moves for a review of the action of the court in constructively denying plaintiff’s motions to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, we are confronted at the very outset with a record which reveals that the jury rendered its verdict on November 18, 1931; that motions after verdict were thereafter promptly made by both parties; that no order extending the time for cause beyond the period expiring sixty days after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Second National Bank of Richmond v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ward v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Borowicz v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Bankers Finance Corp. v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Notbohm v. PallangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beck v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Webster v. KrembsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Nendel v. MeyersOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dupler v. SeubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Beck v. Fond du Lac Highway CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API