Bankers Finance Corp. v. Christensen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
It is the contention of the defendant in this case that the court had no jurisdiction to set aside the verdict on the 5th day of March, the time within which such action was permitted having expired February 12, 1923, the *400court having made no order extending the time for cause. Defendant relied upon the provisions of sec. 2878, Stats., the material part of which is as follows:
“The judge before whom the issue is tried, may, in his discretion, entertain a motion to be made on his minutes, to set aside a verdict and grant a new trial upon exceptions or because the verdict is contrary to law or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ward v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Notbohm v. PallangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by9 opinions
- Independent Life Insurance Co. of America v. WorkTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Jos. P. Jansen Co. v. Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Beck v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Dupler v. SeubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Urban v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.