Nendel v. Meyers
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision.
A verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant George Meyers in the sum of $3,395.57, but not against the defendant H. R. Layton. A judgment in conformity with such verdict was duly entered on August 9, 1938. On August 18, 1938, the plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, based on certain alleged errors of law. The motion for new trial ■was heard and determined on October 8, 1938, but the order was not entered until October 11,1938. The term of court ended on October 2,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Sinko v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Kraft v. LamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lingelbach v. CarriveauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Voinich v. PoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- DeMendoza v. HuffmanOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Emerald People's Utility District v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Ryerse v. HaddockOregon Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.