Legal Opinion

Beck v. Wallmow

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1938PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

In the companion case, Long v. Wallmow, post, p. 660, 277 N. W. 704, the trial judge ordered a new trial on the issues raised by the cross complaint of the defendants, Carl Wallmow and Hardware Mutual Casualty Company against Nora Scanlan, executrix of the will of Patrick J. Scanlan, deceased, and Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. That order was reversed under Rule 32, because neither Wallmow nor his insurance company appeared, filed, or submitted briefs, so the only question *656here is whether the order granting a new trial to the plaintiff as against Nora Scanlan, as executrix, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keeley v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Loucheine v. StrouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Borowicz v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Lingelbach v. CarriveauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bankers Finance Corp. v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Green County Department of Human Services v. H.N.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Toulon v. NagleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Jos. P. Jansen Co. v. Milwaukee Area District Board of Vocational, Technical & Adult EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Boyle v. LarzelereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Gaudynski v. PrussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API