Beck v. Fond du Lac Highway Committee
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.
Since one of the principal contentions in this case is that the trial court as a matter of law should have *596held defendants guilty of negligence, it is necessary to briefly detail the facts. On December 31, 1937, plaintiff Beck was in the employ of plaintiff Badger Liquor Company, of which plaintiff Sadoff was the proprietor. His employment consisted of delivering beer. On that date, while driving north on Highway No'. 41, he collided with a truck belonging to Fond du Lac county and operated by defendants Allen and Morgan under the alleged control and supervision of the individual members of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beck v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Papke v. HaerleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Crowley v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Borowicz v. HamannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Lingelbach v. CarriveauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. TewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Roehl v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Anderson v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
- Rue v. WendlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Ballinger v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.