Legal Opinion
United States v. Wiesen
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 13, 2001No. 01-0134/AR; Crim.App. 9801770PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge BAKER
delivered the opinion of the Court.
A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of attempted forcible sodomy with a child, indecent acts with a child, and obstruction of justice, in violation of Articles 80 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 USC §§ 880 and 934, respectively. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty years, total forfeitures, and reduction to grade E-l. The convening authority approved the findings and sentence as adjudged. The court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. NapoleonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. SmartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. DaultonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
- United States v. GoochCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.