Legal Opinion

United States v. Cole

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 27, 1990No. 63,972; ACM 27858PublishedCited by 204 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

In this case the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force asks us to delimit the powers of the Court of Military Review regarding review of evidentiary rulings by military judges. Art. 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 866. Specifically, pursuant to Article 67(b)(2), UCMJ, 10 USC § 867(b)(2), the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force certified the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF MILITARY REVIEW ERRED, AS A MATTER OF LAW, BY APPLYING THE WRONG STANDARD OF REVIEW IN EVALUATING THE MILITARY JUDGE’S RULING ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  2. United States v. NeeleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. ColeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by204 opinions

  1. United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
  2. United States v. NeradCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  3. United States v. QuirozCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  4. United States v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  5. United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

199 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API