Dietzel v. Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiffs are owners of a large farm and considerable personal property. On June 1, 1918, a policy for $5,500 insurance was issued on the interest of Ferdinand Dietzel in the property, and a like policy was issued to Herbert Dietzel on his interest in the property. These policies were issued by a company which we will call the Flint company. June 1, 1920, the defendant company issued to the two plaintiffs a policy of insurance for $19,600. In the application mention was made of the two policies carried by the Flint company, and it was expected they would both be canceled. Shortly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Home Ins. v. KoobCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Traders' Insurance v. PacaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Fox v. Phenix Fire Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
- Lubetsky v. Standard Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Niagara Fire Insurance v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCoy v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Reliance Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Reliance Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Mosee v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927