Legal Opinion

Dietzel v. Patrons' Mutual Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1925No. Docket No. 59PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiffs are owners of a large farm and considerable personal property. On June 1, 1918, a policy for $5,500 insurance was issued on the interest of Ferdinand Dietzel in the property, and a like policy was issued to Herbert Dietzel on his interest in the property. These policies were issued by a company which we will call the Flint company. June 1, 1920, the defendant company issued to the two plaintiffs a policy of insurance for $19,600. In the application mention was made of the two policies carried by the Flint company, and it was expected they would both be canceled. Shortly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Home Ins. v. KoobCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
  2. Traders' Insurance v. PacaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fox v. Phenix Fire Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
  4. Lubetsky v. Standard Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Niagara Fire Insurance v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Reliance Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Reliance Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Mosee v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API