Legal Opinion

Niagara Fire Insurance v. Scammon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. R. W. Clifford, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

This suit was upon a policy of insurance for $5000, issued by appellant to the testator of appellee, insuring a building in the city of Chicago against loss or damage by fire. At the time the policy was issued the insured premises, with other contiguous property and the buildings thereon, were encumbered by a mortgage for $220,000 to the United States Mortgage Company; for default in the payment of an interest coupon, the mortgage company in February, 1874, declared the whole amount secured by the mortgage due, and assumed to advertise and sell the whole of the mortgaged premises under a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ætna Fire Insurance v. TylerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Ayres v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  3. The Mutual Safety Ins. Co. v. . HoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  4. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Aurora Fire Insurance v. EddyIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beman v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  2. Swoope v. United States Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Lubetsky v. Standard Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Reliance Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Farmers & Merchants Insurance v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API