Legal Opinion
Lubetsky v. Standard Fire Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Wayne; Davis (Frank D. M.), J., presiding. Assumpsit by Isadore Lubetsky against the Standard Fire Insurance Company of New Jersey on a policy of insurance. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
In April, 1919, the People’s National Fire Insurance Company issued to Henry F. Barnard a fire insurance policy in the sum of $2,000 on a frame dwelling house situate at 838 Beaubien street, in the *655city of Detroit. Upon that policy there was indorsed the following provisions:
“It is understood and agreed that the within described property is sold on contract to Morris Raskin and resold by him to David Bernstein and Dora Bernstein, his wife; loss, if any, payablé first, to assured; second, to Morris Raskin; and third to David Bernstein and Dora Bernstein, his wife, as their respective interests…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Home Ins. v. KoobCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Traders' Insurance v. PacaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Fox v. Phenix Fire Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864
- Niagara Fire Insurance v. ScammonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Johnson v. North British, Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1872
3Cited by11 opinions
- McCoy v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Reliance Insurance v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- American & Foreign Insurance v. Allied Plumbing & Heating Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Pearl Assur. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.