Legal Opinion

Todd v. Roane-Anderson Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 29, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwepston, J.

Complainant sued to recover overtime compensation as an employee of defendant. Prom an adverse decree he appeals and assigns error.

By the bill as amended he seeks to recover under three theories, to wit:(1) Upon his contract of employment;(2) Under the Pair Labor Standards Act, 29 U. S. C. A. Sec. 201 et seq.;(a) That he was required to remain ‘‘on call” 24 hours a day for seven days a week during the period of his employment which would amount to 128 hours per week in excess of his 40 hour week; or(b) In any event that he worked 70 hours per week and would therefore be entitled to overtime…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Powell v. United States Cartridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. State ex rel. Loser v. National Optical Stores Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Dumas v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  4. Donaho v. LargeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  5. Watterson v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tibbals Flooring Company v. StanfillTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Wheeler v. WheelerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
  3. Lawson v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  4. Williams v. Sears, RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  5. Williams v. Sears, RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API