Legal Opinion

Dumas v. King

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1946No. 13216, 13222PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

King, an employee, sued under section 16 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216, to recover from his employer (partners operating as the Arkansas General Ice Company) unpaid overtime compensation and an additional equal amount as liquidated damages, in a total sum of $9,176.06. On a trial without a jury, the court entered judgment for $1,-509.44, consisting of $629.72 for overtime compensation, an equal amount for liquidated damages, and $250 for an attorney’s fee. The employer has appealed from the allowance of any recovery, on the ground that King…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Cleo Syrup Corporation v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. Kincade v. MiklesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Brookside Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Wolf v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident AssociationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Van Dyke v. Bluefield Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  4. Ames Nowell v. Alexander C. DickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Pilkenton v. Appalachian Regional Hospitals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1971

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API