Legal Opinion

Tibbals Flooring Company v. Stanfill

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1967PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chattin

This is a -workmen’s compensation ease. The trial judge found the petitioner, Mitchell Stanfill, had suffered an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with the defendant, Tihbals Flooring Company, and as a result was permanently and totally disabled. Benefits were awarded accordingly.

After defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, an appeal was perfected to this Court and errors have been assigned.

The first assignment has for its basis there is no material evidence in the record to support the finding of the trial judge the injury arose out of and in the course of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donaho v. LargeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  2. American Enka Corporation v. SuttonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Hagewood v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Todd v. Roane-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tindall v. Waring Park Ass'nTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ayers Ex Rel. Ayers v. Rutherford Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  4. Foreman v. Automatic Systems, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Price v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API