Legal Opinion
Russoli v. Salisbury Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 20, 2000No. Civil Action 98-2688PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Charles Russoli and Marguerite Russoli have brought the instant action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the Defendants, Thomas E. Anderson, Kevin J. Soberick, Salisbury Township, and Salisbury Township Police Department, violated their rights under the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 1 They have also brought a number of state law claims. Before the Court for disposition is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on all claims, filed by the Defendants on June 26,…
2Cases cited184 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Thames Shipyard & Repair Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Kokinda v. BreinerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Woodard v. Fedex Freight East, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Mantz v. ChainDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Pahle v. Colebrookdale TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.