Mantz v. Chain
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 56(c) AND PLAINTIFF’S CROSS-MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT.
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jeffrey Mantz instituted this action against the New Jersey Highway Authority, the State of New Jersey, and New Jersey state troopers Joseph Chain and Christine Shallcross on August 18, 2000, asserting federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for unlawful arrest, false imprisonment, excessive force, malicious prosecution, and denial of adequate medical care, as well as…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Usavage v. Port AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Ankele v. HambrickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pena v. GreffetDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Thomas v. East Orange Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Roskos v. Sugarloaf TownshipDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.