Legal Opinion

Pahle v. Colebrookdale Township

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 2002PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Ted and Lynn Pahle assert claims under § 1983 1 and state tort claims against several law enforcement officials and departments along with their associated municipalities, arising from Mr. Pahle’s drunk driving arrest on June 28, 1998. We now find that a dispute of material fact exists as to whether Officer Katherine Fryer had probable cause for her detention and arrest of Mr. Pahle. A trier of fact must also determine whether she used excessive force in this arrest. Plaintiffs state law assault and battery and false imprisonment…

2Cases cited107 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Dennis v. DeJongDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Donegan v. LivingstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Thompson v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Kinzer v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2006
  5. Victory Outreach Center v. MelsoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API