Pahle v. Colebrookdale Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ted and Lynn Pahle assert claims under § 1983 1 and state tort claims against several law enforcement officials and departments along with their associated municipalities, arising from Mr. Pahle’s drunk driving arrest on June 28, 1998. We now find that a dispute of material fact exists as to whether Officer Katherine Fryer had probable cause for her detention and arrest of Mr. Pahle. A trier of fact must also determine whether she used excessive force in this arrest. Plaintiffs state law assault and battery and false imprisonment…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dennis v. DeJongDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Donegan v. LivingstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Thompson v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
- Kinzer v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Victory Outreach Center v. MelsoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.