Legal Opinion

City of Murfreesboro v. Haynes

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 7, 1935PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWITT, J.

The plaintiff below, Mrs. R. F. Haynes, was, at the time of the institution of this action, the owner of an estate for her life in a farm of about 300 acres, situated along Stones river, one mile or more from the city of Murfreesboro. She resided on the farm. Her mansion house was situated about 1,700 feet from a plant main tained by the city of Murfreesboro, about 100 feet from Stones river, for the disposal of sewage carried to it in underground sewer pipes from the residences, stores, public buildings, and other places in the city. Mrs. Haynes brought this action against the city of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Terminal Co. v. LellyettTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Nashville v. ComarTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Chattanooga v. DowlingTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Harmon v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Chandler v. Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pate v. City of MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  3. Arcelay v. Sánchez MartínezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
  4. McKinnon v. MichaudCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  5. Signal Mountain Portland Cement Company v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API