Legal Opinion

Harmon v. Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1889PublishedCited by 24 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.

1Opinion of the Court

J. M. Dickinson, Sp. J.

Plaintiff owned a parcel of ground in tie Taxing District of Shelby County by deed, which described it as being “one hundred and fifty feet on the north side of Jackson by one hundred and seventy feet on the west side of Eighth Street.” The Tennessee Southern Railroad Company, to whose rights and liabilities defendant, the L., H., 0. & T. R. R. Co. succeeded, by permission of the Taxing District, and in accordance with a contract made with it May 22, 1883, graded under the supervision of the Engineer of the District, and upon the grades fixed by him, Eighth Street, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Uline v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Grand Rapids & Indiana R. R. v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Illinois Cent. R. v. MoriarityTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Nashville v. ComarTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Chattanooga v. DowlingTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Coleman v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API