Legal Opinion
Chandler v. Davidson County
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1919PublishedCited by 20 opinions
PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and hy certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. — Hon. A. Gr. Eutherford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Lansden
This is an action for personal injuries brought by the plaintiff against Davidson county, the hoard of workhouse commissioners, and others, to recover damages for personal injuries upon the following facts, as stated by the court of civil appeals, and which statement is adopted by her in the brief of her counsel in this court:
*267“This is an action for the recovery of damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff as a result of falling into a hole or ditch by the side of a public road or turnpike in Davidson county, at or near where it is intersected by a roadway…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Burnett v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- McAndrews v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Pierce v. Gibson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Rhea County v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Love v. Nashville Agricultural & Normal InstituteTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
- Buckholtz v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Gulf Refining Co. v. Mark C. Walker & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- City of Murfreesboro v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.