Legal Opinion
Stevens v. City of Cannon Beach
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1993No. CC 90-2061; CA A68916; SC S39585PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiffs appeal a trial court’s judgment dismissing their complaint for inverse condemnation for failure to state a claim. ORCP 21A(8). Plaintiffs own two vacant lots in the dry-sand area of the City of Cannon Beach (city). They applied to defendants city and Oregon Department of Parks and Recreation (department) for permits to build a seawall as part of the eventual development of the lots for motel or hotel use. City and department denied the application on a number of grounds.
Plaintiffs then brought this inverse condemnation action, alleging that defendants’ denials, and the ordinances…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Severance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Jensen v. WhitlowOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ChristianOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Cope v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.