Legal Opinion

Frank v. McCarthy

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1948No. Nos. 7076, 7077PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.

Hyrum Frank, as truck driver, and his father and employer, George Frank, each brought suit for damages sustained in consequence of a railroad crossing collision in Provo, Utah. On stipulation of the parties, the cases were consolidated for trial, since the same evidence was applicable to both cases. Each plaintiff recovered a verdict; the defendants appeal.

There is sufficient evidence to show negligence on the part of defendant Trustees, which was a proximate cause of the injuries of which plaintiffs complain. The principle questions raised by the assignments of error…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. RusynikOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. George v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Pippy v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  5. McCarney v. Pennsylvania R. R., Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Seybold v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Abdulkadir v. Western Pacific Railroad CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Lake v. EmighMontana Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API