Frank v. McCarthy
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McDONOUGH, Chief Justice.
Hyrum Frank, as truck driver, and his father and employer, George Frank, each brought suit for damages sustained in consequence of a railroad crossing collision in Provo, Utah. On stipulation of the parties, the cases were consolidated for trial, since the same evidence was applicable to both cases. Each plaintiff recovered a verdict; the defendants appeal.
There is sufficient evidence to show negligence on the part of defendant Trustees, which was a proximate cause of the injuries of which plaintiffs complain. The principle questions raised by the assignments of error…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Rd. Co. v. RusynikOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- George v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
- Rau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- Pippy v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
- McCarney v. Pennsylvania R. R., Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Seybold v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Abdulkadir v. Western Pacific Railroad CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Blaske v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Lake v. EmighMontana Supreme Court · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.