Legal Opinion

Rau v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1930No. 6,583PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It was claimed by the defendants at the trial of this action, in their argument for a motion for nonsuit, that the evidence on the defendants' failure to sound the whistle and ring the bell on the locomotive of said passenger train was insufficient to take the case to the jury. On this question whether or not the whistle was sounded and bell rung on a locomotive on approaching a crossing, we have several cases in Montana holding that the evidence such as that introduced at the trial of this case, even though it is considered as negative evidence and is opposed by so-called positive testimony,…

2Cases cited96 opinions

  1. Railroad Company v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Staff v. Montana Petroleum Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. In Re Silver's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sztaba v. Great Northern Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Broberg v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API