Legal Opinion

Pippy v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1932No. 5067PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff and appellant to recover damages for personal injuries. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s evidence a motion for nonsuit was granted on the ground of contributory negligence and the action dismissed. He appeals assigning the ruling as error. By his complaint, so far as here material, he in substance alleged that the accident occurred at a public crossing on Eighth West and Fourteenth North streets in Salt Lake City by a collision of a passenger train operated by the defendant and a Ford motortruck driven by the plaintiff; that at the intersection of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Schofield v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Clark v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Crowley v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Butler Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Tony Lopez v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. McIntire v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Incret v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Seybold v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API