Legal Opinion

McCarney v. Pennsylvania R. R., Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1932No. Appeal, 22PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The only question is whether plaintiff’s contributory negligence should be declared as matter of law; the learned trial judge stated that he was in some doubt about it.

On December 27, 1927, at about four o’clock in the afternoon, plaintiff was injured at a grade crossing. In the charge, the crossing is described as a “permissive crossing”; it was composed of planks, ashes and cinders, and was used for the purpose of supplying coal, etc., to a power house constructed on the south or river side of the railroad. The railroad, at that point, and for miles along the Ohio…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nolder v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. MarceilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Alio v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Taylor v. Reading Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Frank v. McCarthyUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Minella v. Penna. R. R. Co., (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API