People v. Von Perhacs
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The defendant in this ease was convicted of the crime of rape. The information charged the defendant with having committed an act of sexual intercourse with a female child who was at the time under the age of sixteen years and not his wife. The defendant has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.
The insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, the alleged erroneous modification of certain requested instructions, and the refusal of the lower court to grant a new trial upon alleged newly discovered evidence are the only points urged for a reversal.
It is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- De Arellanes v. ArellanesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. TroutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Strand v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. CoontzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- State v. RichardsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.