Strand v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Justice.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was convicted of rape of his own daughter who at the time of the offense was about ten and one-half years of age.
The testimony of the prosecutrix reveals a shocking state of depravity. If the defendant committed the act charged, his wife, the mother of prosecutrix, probably knew at the time what was being done. It is contended that the evi dence was insufficient. The testimony of the prosecutrix as to the main fact, i. e., that defendant was the person who had carnal knowledge of her, was not corroborated. A conviction…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GoodaleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Keffer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- Gaunce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Reeves v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- People v. Von PerhacsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Chapman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Elliott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Wedmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Oldham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.