Jay v. Weinberg
District Court, N.D. Illinois
■ In Equity. Suit by Webb Jay and the Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corporation against Frederick Weinberg and the Auto Parts Company. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
Infringement suit on patents No. 1,-067,814, issued to Higginson & Arundel, 1,132,273, to Jay, and 1,134,-457, to Jay, upon a vacuum tank for automobiles. The suit involves eaidier forms of the vacuum tank commonly used for raising the gasoline from a main tank located below the carbureter, and supplying it to the latter by gravity. The Stewart-Warner Company has supplied the tank in the commercial form, not made^ under the patents in suit, to about 140 manufacturers, and in the three years ending last January has so supplied 1,595,577 tanks. The commercial structure…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Rowell v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sparks-Withington Co. v. JayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Jay v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
- Jay v. Ireland & Matthews Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- Jay v. Sparks-Withington Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1918
- Jay v. SuetterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.