Legal Opinion

Jay v. Weinberg

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 29, 1919No. 2646PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Illinois. Suit in equity by Webb Jay and the Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corporation against Frederick Weinberg and the Auto Parts Company. Decree for defendants, and complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decree dismissing appellants’ bill for infringement of the Higginson and Arun-del patent, No. 1,067,814, and the Jay patents, Nos. 1,132,273 and 1,134,457, for vacuum suction means of raising gasoline in an automobile from a main tank below the level of the carburetor into a secondary tank from which gasoline flows to the carburetor by gravity.

[1] The trial court found that in the water-elevating art the principle of operation whereby a fluid is lifted by vacuum suction and discharged by gravity, and the general combinations of mechanical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loew Supply & Mfg. Co. v. Fred Miller Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
  2. Jay v. WeinbergDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sales Affiliates, Inc. v. National Mineral Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Sparks-Withington Co. v. JayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
  3. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1930
  4. Jay v. Ireland & Matthews Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  5. Acme Card System Co. v. Globe-Wernicke Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API