Jay v. Sparks-Withington Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
In Equity. Bill by Webb Jay and the Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corporation against the Sparks-Withington Company. Decree for plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the Court
WESTKNHAVEE, District Judge.
The bill in this case is the usual one charging infringement of certain patents and praying an injunction. The defenses are the usual defenses of invalidity and noninfringement. Complainants’ bill is based on Ünited States letters patent No. 1,067,814, issued to Higginson & Arundel, and Nos. 1,132,273 and 1,-134,457, issued to Webb Jay. The Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corporation is the owner of the Higginson & Arundel patent, and the exclusive licensee of the Jay patents. Claim 1 of the Higginson & Arundel patent, claims 1, 3, 9, 13, and 14 of the Jay patent, No.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Adams Electric Ry. Co. v. Lindell Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Penfield v. C. & A. Potts & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- Beach v. HobbsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sparks-Withington Co. v. JayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Jay v. Ireland & Matthews Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
- Jay v. SuetterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Universal Rim Co. v. Firestone Steel Products Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923