Rothstein v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In 1948 or 1949, a radioactive X-ray contrast dye known as Thorotrast was administered to Ari Rothstein, the plaintiffs decedent, who was then approximately 10 years old. In 1988 *56Mr. Rothstein died while undergoing exploratory surgery as a result of internal bleeding due to an angiosarcoma mass on his liver. Two years later, his widow, the plaintiff, commenced this action alleging that her husband’s cancer had been caused by the administration of the dye. On a prior appeal, we held that CPLR 214-c, the toxic tort discovery statute, was applicable to the personal injury…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- City of New York v. Charles Pfizer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Rothstein v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Semenetz v. Sherling & Walden, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Drexler v. Highlift, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Rivera v. Anderson United Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001